openpilot G-Wagon evals

All models

Cinque v3 f78ed37d

2026-09-18 Merged to openpilot master 2026-09-18

Lateral action rate 36% lower and lateral error 26% higher than lebowski (39 segments). Against Cinque v2: lower lateral error and longitudinal error; higher lateral action rate.

Key numbers

The tick is lebowski. Lateral action rate and lateral lead have no better direction; on the others lower is better. Compared with lebowski and with Cinque v2 1a421175, the model first public before it.

Lateral action rateRMS rate of change of the lateral request0.42 m/s³
Lateral leadHow far ahead of the car's turning the request best matches it0.47 s
Lateral errorRequest against the car's lateral motion that followed0.14 m/s²
Distance from path at 2 s, closed loopMedian over segments, comma's ideal carnot run yet
G55 distance from path at 2 sMedian over windows, G55 steering modelnot run yet
G55 at 2 s after a 0.5 m offsetMedian over windowsnot run yet

All scores

better, 95% interval excludes zero Better, 95% interval excludes zeroworse, 95% interval excludes zero Worse, interval excludes zerolower, 95% interval excludes zero; no better directionhigher, 95% interval excludes zero; no better direction Lower or higher, no better direction (action rate, lead)not separated, interval includes zero Not separatedno interval (too few drives) No interval: fewer than 10 drives

comma's public drives, open loop

39 segments from 23 drives. Per-segment CSV.

Measured. comma's public two-camera segments (openpilot CI data), native intrinsics and the device's own calibration, both cameras; every model on the same decoded frames. Truth is what the recording car did next: carState speed and acceleration, yaw rate from the device's cameraOdometry. Segments where the car never moves have no data. 39 of the 45 listed segments have a score, from 23 drives and 20 cars.

MetricMeanvs lebowskivs Cinque v2
Lateral errorm/s², lower is better0.137[0.108, 0.166]median 0.124worse, 95% interval excludes zero+0.028[+0.017, +0.039]better on 7/39better, 95% interval excludes zero−0.011[−0.020, −0.003]better on 24/39
Lateral error at the model's own best leadm/s², lower is better0.128[0.101, 0.157]median 0.115worse, 95% interval excludes zero+0.027[+0.015, +0.038]better on 8/39better, 95% interval excludes zero−0.009[−0.019, −0.001]better on 21/39
Lateral correlation with the car's later motionhigher is better0.827[0.739, 0.905]median 0.940not separated, interval includes zero−0.031[−0.081, +0.011]better on 8/39better, 95% interval excludes zero+0.032[+0.006, +0.074]better on 28/39
Lateral gain (1 = same size as the car's motion)closer to 1 is better; the delta is the change in distance from 10.754[0.665, 0.840]median 0.789not separated, interval includes zero+0.065[−0.014, +0.133]better on 14/39better, 95% interval excludes zero−0.054[−0.090, −0.028]better on 35/39
Lateral action rate, RMS (smoothness)m/s³, no better direction0.422[0.343, 0.511]median 0.366lower, 95% interval excludes zero; no better direction−0.242[−0.293, −0.187]lower on 38/39higher, 95% interval excludes zero; no better direction+0.010[+0.004, +0.017]lower on 12/39
Lead of the lateral request over the car's motions, no better direction0.466[0.366, 0.577]median 0.425n = 34higher, 95% interval excludes zero; no better direction+0.065[+0.009, +0.132]lower on 8/33not separated, interval includes zero−0.013[−0.032, +0.012]lower on 17/32
Longitudinal errorm/s², lower is better0.302[0.260, 0.349]median 0.271not separated, interval includes zero−0.006[−0.020, +0.008]better on 20/39better, 95% interval excludes zero−0.015[−0.022, −0.009]better on 32/39
Longitudinal correlationhigher is better0.729[0.630, 0.817]median 0.837not separated, interval includes zero+0.012[−0.008, +0.031]better on 21/39better, 95% interval excludes zero+0.012[+0.003, +0.024]better on 24/39
Longitudinal error while brakingm/s², lower is better0.408[0.348, 0.477]median 0.388n = 30not separated, interval includes zero−0.027[−0.058, +0.010]better on 15/30better, 95% interval excludes zero−0.033[−0.054, −0.016]better on 25/30
Longitudinal action rate, RMS (smoothness)m/s³, no better direction0.880[0.799, 0.971]median 0.816lower, 95% interval excludes zero; no better direction−0.453[−0.595, −0.321]lower on 37/39higher, 95% interval excludes zero; no better direction+0.113[+0.086, +0.139]lower on 3/39
Plan speed error at 3 sm/s, lower is better0.758[0.658, 0.888]median 0.744not separated, interval includes zero+0.043[−0.010, +0.094]better on 14/39not separated, interval includes zeroidenticalon all 39

comma's public drives, closed loop

Not run for this model yet.

G55, open loop

4 windows from 3 drives.

Measured. The G55's recorded drives replayed as the truck runs the model: narrow camera only, road-plane warp to 1.45 m (plane:1.45). Truth is the truck's CAN speed and yaw rate. Window = unit. 4 windows: 3 on an earlier camera mount, 1 on the current mount; 2 at night.

MetricMeanvs lebowskivs Cinque v2
Lateral errorm/s², lower is better0.147no intervalmedian 0.161no interval (too few drives)+0.020no intervalbetter on 0/40/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)−0.004no intervalbetter on 4/43/3 drives
Lateral error at the model's own best leadm/s², lower is better0.142no intervalmedian 0.153no interval (too few drives)+0.015no intervalbetter on 1/41/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)−0.001no intervalbetter on 1/41/3 drives
Lateral correlation with the car's later motionhigher is better0.946no intervalmedian 0.946no interval (too few drives)−0.015no intervalbetter on 1/41/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)+0.016no intervalbetter on 4/43/3 drives
Lateral gain (1 = same size as the car's motion)closer to 1 is better; the delta is the change in distance from 10.848no intervalmedian 0.846no interval (too few drives)+0.095no intervalbetter on 0/40/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)−0.023no intervalbetter on 2/41/3 drives
Lateral action rate, RMS (smoothness)m/s³, no better direction0.512no intervalmedian 0.510no interval (too few drives)−0.445no intervallower on 4/43/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)−0.006no intervallower on 3/42/3 drives
Lead of the lateral request over the car's motions, no better direction0.425no intervalmedian 0.475no interval (too few drives)+0.087no intervallower on 1/41/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)−0.037no intervallower on 2/41/3 drives
Longitudinal errorm/s², lower is better0.317no intervalmedian 0.317no interval (too few drives)+0.003no intervalbetter on 2/41/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)+0.002no intervalbetter on 1/41/3 drives
Longitudinal correlationhigher is better0.563no intervalmedian 0.620no interval (too few drives)−0.019no intervalbetter on 0/40/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)+0.001no intervalbetter on 3/42/3 drives
Longitudinal error while brakingm/s², lower is better0.584no intervalmedian 0.600no interval (too few drives)+0.069no intervalbetter on 1/41/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)−0.027no intervalbetter on 4/43/3 drives
Longitudinal action rate, RMS (smoothness)m/s³, no better direction1.27no intervalmedian 1.22no interval (too few drives)−0.48no intervallower on 4/43/3 drivesno interval (too few drives)+0.19no intervallower on 0/40/3 drives
Plan speed error at 3 sm/s, lower is better1.05no intervalmedian 1.05no interval (too few drives)+0.02no intervalbetter on 2/42/3 drivesnot separated, interval includes zeroidenticalon all 4

G55, closed loop

Not run for this model yet.

G55, recovery tests

Not run for this model yet.

Limits

The model file

Model id
f78ed37d_12864
SHA-256
404a18cfd86d29637d20c697dfde245bb47c666ae016730ab674c65f4d1e1aa4
File scored
huggingface, 81a9ad0139976653c041de50b60f1160a873869e (link), 2026-09-18
First public
2026-09-18
Parameters
381.6M
GMAC per step
46.7
Family
big-rl
Scored
2026-10-27 21:27 UTC, suite geval-1, code 102710f59c
Notes
On openpilot master 2026-09-18 (PR #38932). Vision base b9facbcc, no residual head.

Results file (results/f78ed37d_12864.json, schema 1).